Version Affected: All
Description:
After configuring a FIDO enrolment Realm in New Experience and attempting to enrol a FIDO Device, the Enrolment will fail with 'We couldn't verify your device. Try again later or use a different browser, device or operating system'
Cause:
This can be caused by the 'Authenticator-Type' in use, compared to the forced Authenticator-Type required by the Authenticator itself.
If the Authenticator requires an Authenticator-Type which is not selected within the FIDO enrolment Realm configuration, the enrolment will fail with the above error.
For example, selecting 'Cross-Platform' and 'Platform' should allow enrolments of Yubikeys and Windows Hello devices as per the description within the UX, as below:
But if the Authenticator passes back an Authenticator-Type of unspecified and we do not have unspecified selected in the UX, the enrolment will fail.
IdP can not influence the Authenticators themselves, we can limit the Authenticators which can be used when enrolling a FIDO device, by only allowing Authenticators which allow 'Cross-Platform' or 'Platform', but this may be a bit too restrictive for business use.
To ensure devices can still be enrolled even if the Authenticators themselves pass back an Authenticator-Type of unspecified, we need to ensure we are configured to allow those Authenticator-Types to be used
Resolution:
Ensuring the 'Unspecified' Authenticator-Type is selected within the FIDO enrolment Realm configuration, will allow the enrolment to complete as expected in most cases
SecureAuth Knowledge Base Articles provide information based on specific use cases and may not apply to all appliances or configurations. Be advised that these instructions could cause harm to the environment if not followed correctly or if they do not apply to the current use case.
Customers are responsible for their own due diligence prior to utilizing this information and agree that SecureAuth is not liable for any issues caused by misconfiguration directly or indirectly related to SecureAuth products.
Comments
Article is closed for comments.